A Son Of Liberty

So, like usual, I open my mouth to discuss a hotly-debated subject and it gets me in trouble. On the way back from lunch today, I listened to a discussion about homosexuality and gay marriage. The participants -- at the time, not me -- were vaguely referring to the fact that they accepted both as long as it was "kept behind closed doors." Some guys at work were labeled as being "on the fence" sexually because they seemed to have tendencies. There was some giggling. But it was an accepted fact.

Well, someone in the front seat said, "[Joe], you're being awful quiet. I'm sure you have an opinion. What do you think?"

I explained that my views are very conservative and I quasi-jokingly referred to my Baptist background. I then proceeded to explain that 50 years ago, homosexuality was morally wrong according to most people. But today, people have decided that homosexuality is alright based on bubblegum arguments. One of the most popular arguments is that someone is genetically disposed to be gay. So, I asked if anyone would be opposed to consider that people who are attracted to kids or animals may be genetically disposed to be that way and should, therefore, be accepted and given "equal rights."

A lady in the front seat became a little upset and said that it that was different and completely uncalled for. She became incensed because of her strong feelings about molestation. So, I redefined the argument and asked upon what are the 18-year-old adulthood laws based? In my opinion, I said, it seems arbitrary. Is not a 13-year old able to make reasoned decisions (sometimes unwise, but at least reasoned immaturely)? And, if so, what will keep the next generation from redefining adulthood -- and, therefore, consent -- and say that we shouldn't discriminate against someone who "loves" children if we're willing to concede on consensual adult homosexuality?

When we parked, she stormed off and as she did I joined her and apologized if I had offended. I told her that it may not have been the politically correct response, but it was how I felt.

My job's not in jeopardy. Most people in the car agreed with me, but also agreed that we shouldn't discuss the subject again.

Proudly intolerant,

Joe